Technology strategy (e.g. as in Information technology (IT)) is a particular generation of an organization's overall objective(s), principles and tactics relating to the technologies that the organization uses. Such strategies primarily focus on the technologies themselves and in some cases the people who directly manage those technologies. The strategy can be implied from the organization's behaviors towards technology decisions, and may be written down in a document.
Other generations of technology-related strategies primarily focus on: the efficiency of the company's spending on technology; how people, for example the organization's customers and employees, exploit technologies in ways that create value for the organization; on the full integration of technology-related decisions with the company's strategies and operating plans, such that no separate technology strategy exists other than the de facto strategic principle that the organization does not need or have a discreet 'technology strategy'.
A technology strategy has traditionally been expressed in a document that explains how technology should be utilized as part of an organization's overall corporate strategy and each business strategy. In the case of IT, the strategy is usually formulated by a group of representatives from both the business and from IT. Often the Information Technology Strategy is led by an organization's Chief Technology Officer (CTO) or equivalent. Accountability varies for an organization's strategies for other classes of technology. Although many companies write an overall business plan each year, a technology strategy may cover developments somewhere between three and 5 years into the future. Henry offers a four-step approach: the audit, assessing the strategic implications of the technology portfolio, an implementation plan, and a technology monitoring programme chapters.
Step 1: The audit
Henry states: ‘A technology-asset audit focuses on determining the real or perceived value that any technology node, or its individual technology links, has in the business benefit – cost chain – from raw material acquisition, to the supply of the produce or service, to the customer’. He suggests that comparisons should be made against the competitors. Several basic questions are proposed for an audit.
However Abell suggests a three-dimensional matrix which classifies activities under the headings customer function, customer groups and alternative technologies. Figure shows the shell of such a matrix. It is possible for a business to serve multiple-or single-customer functions, to specialise on a narrow or broad range of customer groups, or to use one or more technologies to meet those functions and the requirements of the customer groups.This method, which pays attention to some of the questions of Henry, although technology might well be defined much ore broadly under the Abell. The Three Dimensional Business Definition framework from Harvard Professor Derek F. Abell is a model that can be used for defining the business of a company. The definition of a business is an issue that should not be taken lightly. In his book "Defining the Business - The Starting Point of Strategic Planning" Abell says that the standard two dimensional way of looking at a business (products and markets) has serious flaws. He suggests a three dimensional model, with the following 3 axes:
Figure illustrates a way of trying to define and examine technologies across an organisation. This particular example is derived from an assignment of mine in an unusual organisation which was a cross between consulting engineering and process engineering, although neither term is an accurate description of the activity. In essence, the business was concerned with the application of engineering principles to new applications, up to and including the installation of the proven prototype. The technical strands of a business such as this are of great importance in defining future strategy. To preserve confidentiality I have extended it to a completely different industry.
Assessing the strategic implications of the technology portfolio
Henry argues: ‘Step 2 of the Analysis is conducted with a view to ascertaining how best to leverage the company’s technology assets to meet tomorrow’s business objectives as defined by the strategic plan.’ Neubauer suggests a technology matrix, a version of which appears in Figure. This has technology position on one axis, moving from weak to strong. The other axis shows relevance of the technology, ranging from low for old technologies of little value to high for new technologies where many applications are possible. Strategic business units are plotted on the matrix .
The suggestion is that the final matrix would be used first to check that current investment in technology matches the need, and that priorities are shifted to reduce investment in low-relevance technologies, and increase it in business where the company needs to catch up or maintain leadership.
Neubauer makes the link between the type of portfolio analysis and the technology matrix. This could be made tighter by combining the information. The simplest method might be to colour code the SBUs on the market prospects/competitive position matrix according to their position on the technology matrix. Nine codes may be a little too much to digest, but it should be possible to reduce these to a manageable four by redrawing the grid on the matrix.
Strategic Management Related Interview Questions
|Marketing Strategy Interview Questions||Marketing Management Interview Questions|
|Strategic Brand Management Interview Questions||Corporate Governance and Business Ethics Interview Questions|
|Strategic Planning for Project Management Interview Questions||Quality Management Interview Questions|
|Corporate Social Responsibility Interview Questions||Business Development Interview Questions|
|Corporate Communication Interview Questions||Business Development Manager Interview Questions|
Strategic Management Related Practice Tests
|Marketing Strategy Practice Tests||Marketing Management Practice Tests|
|Corporate Governance and Business Ethics Practice Tests||Quality Management Practice Tests|
|Corporate Social Responsibility Practice Tests||Business Development Practice Tests|
|Corporate Communication Practice Tests|
Strategic Management Tutorial
From Planning To Strategic Management And Beyond
Strategic Management: Success Or Failure?
A Look At The Total Process
The Challenge Of The Future
The Environment: Assumptions In Planning
Techniques For Assessing The Environment
Business Philosophy (ethics And Morality) And Strategic Management
The Corporate Appraisal – Assessing Strengths And Weaknesses
Analysing The Industry And Competitors
Analysing The Uk Management Development And Training Industry: A Case History
The Search For Shareholder Value
Vision And Objectives
Strategic Portfolio Analysis
Portfolio Analysis In Practice
Strategic Planning – A Second Look At The Basic Options
Multinational And Global Strategy
Technology And Manufacturing
Strategic Planning For Human Resources
Relating To The External Environment
Evaluating A Business Plan
Project Planning And Appraisal
From Plans To Actions
Management Of Change
Introducing Strategic Management
Why Planning Sometimes Fails
Strategic Management To Strategic Change?
All rights reserved © 2018 Wisdom IT Services India Pvt. Ltd
Wisdomjobs.com is one of the best job search sites in India.