Key steps to establish a sound base pay program are:
I. Job Analysis
The first step in determining abasepay program is to understand the jobs and their requirements. This process requires writing job descriptions which require supervisory input. Job descriptions are written statements that describe reporting relationships, duties, responsibilities, and qualifications for positions. Job descriptions have many purposes and are used in recruitment, staffing, training, performance management, and compensation decisions.
II. Job Evaluation
After defining jobs, the second step is determining the worth of the positions. There are two major schools of thought regarding job evaluation: market-driven and job worth. In a market-drivencompensationsystem, the “market-rate” for the position is the primary determinate of pay. The ‘market-rate’ is the best estimate of the wage rate that is prevailing in the external labor market for a given job or occupation. The quality of external comparisons is critical.
Not all positions exist in all organizations; in these cases, determining job worth is difficult and slotting may be required. Since pay levels can jump substantially in a particular year due to labor shortages, most organizations prefer to wait out these changes rather than immediately increasing pay. Market-driven systems should be monitored closely to track changes in pay.
In a job-worth system, the primary determinate of pay is the value of the job to the organization. In some cases, a job-worth system can result in pay differences from the external marketplace. In job-worth systems, jobs are ranked or assigned points by various factors (i.e. skills, effort required to achieve results, scope, etc.). These factors may be weighted. In this type of system, internal equity is more important than external market conditions.
III. Market Analysis
Identification of ‘benchmark’ jobs to survey in the job market is a key step in a market analysis process. Benchmark jobs are easily identified in the marketplace for pay comparisons and reflect a good representation of positions within the organization, both vertically and horizontally. Examples of vertical representation may be: Accountant, Senior Accountant, and Accounting Supervisor.
Horizontal representations include jobs by functions, such as engineering, accounting, HR, etc. Many companies participate in salary surveys conducted by third-party consulting firms which collect average salaries and bonuses paid in the generic survey benchmark jobs. Also provided are results on overall pay practices.
Survey results are usually displayed by all companies, industry, location, and size. Specialized ‘cuts’ of survey results may be requested showing aggregate information by competitor organizations. Companies are able to use the salary survey results in determining the competitiveness of salaries paid to employees in their company.
IV. Salary Structure Development
The fourth step after conducting a market analysis of benchmark jobs is to develop a salary structure. A salary structure represents grouping benchmark jobs into salary gradesbased on the salary survey median salaries. The determination on the number of salary grades (or levels) within a salary structure is also predicated on an internal ranking of the importance of the jobs to the organization.
This ranking isbased on job responsibilities, complexities, skill, and experience required for the jobs. Each salary grade is assigned a salary rangebased on the market data from the cluster of jobs assigned to each grade. Understanding the fundamentals of a salary range is critical. Every salary range has a minimum, midpoint, and maximum.
The minimum is often used as the starting salary, and mostcompensationsystems gear merit increases to move employees to the midpoint of the salary range. The midpoint, which represents the middle data value of given salary range or pay grade, targets a composite market rate for the jobs assigned to a salary grade. The maximum is the highest rate paid for a position in that grade.
Employees’ salaries above the maximum are often “red-circled,” meaning that their pay is frozen until salary-range adjustments place current salaries below the maximum. Typically, salary ranges are reviewed and updated annually. The difference between the minimum and the maximum is called the ‘spread’.
In an effort to reflect flattening organizational structure, some organizations have adopted a small number of extremely wide salary ranges called salary bands. While traditional ranges are from 30-50 percent wide, bands may be as wide as 100 percent or more. Salary ranges also are used to determine the size and frequency of merit increases.
V. Performance Management Process
The fifth step is having a sound performance management process. Managing employee performance involves the planning and assessment of individual and/or team effort toward the achievement of individual and organizational goals. Managers are responsible for ensuring that individuals understand what work results are expected and how their job performance will be evaluated. Ongoing feedback is essential in motivating employees to improve performance.
VI. Merit Increase Administration
The sixth step is linking pay for performance. This includes designing a process of determining merit increases based on a distribution of individual performance ratings. This can be accomplished by designing a ‘merit increase matrix’. A ‘merit increase matrix’ is a process for giving managers a uniform tool to determine the size of merit increase for each employee.
This matrix is based on performance rating distribution in relation to the employee’s salary position in their salary range (salary index). In developing this matrix, it is important to determine where the organization pays in relation to the market. A company with high turnover will have many employees near the lower ends of its salary ranges. A company that pays far below the market may need a higher-than-normal merit matrix to increase pay to the appropriate levels.
Top performers should receive merit increases that are significantly higher than employees who are meeting expectation – if possible, these increases should be double the size of increase received by employees who meet expectations. Employees who are significantly below performance expectations generally do not receive increases.
VII. Salary Management
On an annual basis, it is important to review pay equity situations within departments, divisions, and the company to ensure if there are any pay problems that need resolution. This analysis is often combined with a diversity program analysis, which reviews actual or perceived inequities between various groups or individuals.
For an organization to attract and retain talent, it is of utmost importance that it is able to provide an attractive compensation package. Companies providing good compensation packages naturally stir some level of inquisitiveness in the minds of a prospective candidate. Along with the brand value of the organization, for attracting top talent, a well designed compensation package plays a crucial role.
But, how does a company go about designing their compensation package? Approaching compensation package from a very conservative point of view could result in not attracting top talent, and being overly generous could mean wasted money thereby a hit on the company’s profitability. Compensation Benchmarking is a key element in designing a pay package.
This article attempts to lay out the different steps involved in the process of compensation benchmarking. The first step involves categorization of employees on basis of the role performed in the organization. Roles in turn depend on the function that the employee falls into. Typical functions that exist in an organization are Operations, Sales and marketing, management (first level, mid level and top), HR, Finance & Accounting and Administrative functions to name a few.
Some organizations define a salary group depending upon the function and the role played. However, more common practice is to define salary groups that would be applicable across all functions. Then they proceed to identify roles in each of the functions that fall into different salary groups.
For instance a delivery manager in the operations function could map to a location manager in the admin function and a business development manager in the sales and marketing function. The idea is that as you go up the group hierarchy, competencies expected tend to converge. Thus a senior vice president of operations and that of administration would be more of a business role.
In high growth industries the demand for talent is also high; hence it is sometimes important to distinguish between people within the same function, same salary band and same roles. Thus, there arises a need to have a top, middle and bottom compensation range for a salary group.
When hiring a lateral recruit, since the person is yet to prove, often companies introduce him into the lower part of the salary band and then re-position him depending upon the performance. When a company tries to attract the candidate by offering a significantly large pay package, it risks in creating internal dissatisfaction amongst its existing employees along with putting a bet on an unknown quantity.
Any pricing mechanism that is not influenced by market demand is bound to run into problems; compensation packages are no different. Organizations are known to collect competitive intelligence regarding the pay packages to dole out the competition. HR managers then take a call based on what percentile of paymasters they want to belong to. Though it is not necessary to be among the top paying employers to attract right talent, it definitely pays to be in the top 70 percentile.
In knowledge industries the availability or lack of talent pool can virtually make or break a company. Hence, compensation benchmarking is an important tool in the hands of HR managers and executive management to attract and retain talent.
Figure below is an example of a detailed table for the para planner position from the 2003 study.
Business Management for Financial Advisers Related Interview Questions
|Financial Planning Interview Questions||Financial Reporting and Analysis Interview Questions|
|Financial Management Interview Questions||Accounts and Finance for Managers Interview Questions|
|Financial Accounting&Financial Statement Analysis Interview Questions||Business Finance Interview Questions|
|Financial Services Marketing Interview Questions||Corporate Finance Interview Questions|
|Financial Analyst Interview Questions||Financial Advisor Interview Questions|
Business Management for Financial Advisers Related Practice Tests
|Financial Planning Practice Tests||Financial Reporting and Analysis Practice Tests|
|Financial Management Practice Tests||Accounts and Finance for Managers Practice Tests|
|Financial Accounting&Financial Statement Analysis Practice Tests||Business Finance Practice Tests|
|Financial Services Marketing Practice Tests|
Business Management For Financial Advisers Tutorial
The Financial Advisory Business
Defining The Business
The Value Of Surveys
The Challenge Of Growth
Human Capital: The Fulcrum Of Strategy
The Care And Preening Of Staff: Professional Development
The Payoff For The Firm: Compensation Planning
The Tools That Count: Financial Management
The Other Dirty Words
Referrals And Joint Ventures: The Search For Solutions
All rights reserved © 2018 Wisdom IT Services India Pvt. Ltd
Wisdomjobs.com is one of the best job search sites in India.